Partner visa planning is often delayed because couples believe their relationship evidence is “not strong enough”.

This case involved a long-term relationship where traditional evidence — such as extended cohabitation or joint leases — was limited. The de facto relationship was formally registered during the visa process, creating potential concerns around timing and disclosure.

From a legal perspective, the key issue was not when the relationship was registered, but whether the relationship itself was genuine, ongoing, and properly disclosed.

Our team focused on clarifying the distinction between the formation of the relationship and the timing of registration. By restructuring the relationship timeline and proactively updating the Department with a clear legal explanation, the relationship status was successfully managed in a compliant manner.

This allowed the case to proceed on a sound footing and established a compliant basis for a subsequent 482 partner visa application.

This case highlights an important point: partner visas are not determined by a checklist of documents, but by how evidence, timing, and disclosure are legally assessed together.

📅 Book a lawyer consultation: https://calendly.com/getprfaster

📧 Email: enquiry@riverwoodmigration.com

💬 Chat with Johnny: https://linktr.ee/johnny_lawyer